Skip to main content

Primer-The Telephone Sequence

Adding and Subtracting Three is as Easy as 147. 



 147? I told you it was weird. Hopefully you have done your homework since my last post and studied the telephone dialing pad. The first thing we need to do is rotate it 90° counter-clockwise and then move the zero to the top left next to the 3 key.

Now, let's skip count in 3's starting at 0. Follow along the telephone sequence with your finger: 


 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30. 
We are back at the beginning of the sequence, 0. Do you see what happened to the tens' place when we changed rows? It incremented. If you commit this sequence to memory, then you can easily add 3 to any number. For example, 34 + 3 = 37 because 7 comes after 4 in the telephone sequence and since it is on the same row, the tens' place value does not change. How about 28 + 3? Since the next number in the telephone sequence is 1 and it appears on the next row, we increment the tens' place value to get 31. 

 Let's skip count backwards in 3's starting at 30. Follow along the telephone sequence with your finger:


 30, 27, 24, 21, 18, 15,12, 9, 6, 3. 
The sequence is in reverse and we decrement the tens' place value when we change rows. Now we subtract 3 from any value easily. For example, 25 – 3 = 22 since 2 is the previous number in the telephone sequence. The tens' place value did not change, because we did not change rows. How about 31 – 3? Since 8 comes before 1 in the telephone sequence and it is on a different row we decrement the tens' place value to get 28.

 Most of you probably have experience with number keypads like those on telephones so memorizing the telephone sequence is not very difficult. Memorizing it pays a tremendous dividend when adding and subtracting 7.

Use the Telephone Sequence for Seven Too.

Why can we use the telephone sequence to add and subtract seven? Since 7 = 10 – 3, we can use the telephone sequence backwards to add and subtract seven. Let's skip count in 7's starting at 7 while following along the telephone sequence backwards with our finger:


 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, 70, 77. 
And we've cycled back around to the beginning again. You can see that this time, we always increment the tens' place unless we change rows, in which case we don't. 

Let's skip count backwards in sevens starting at 77. Again, follow along through the sequence with your finger.


 77, 70, 63, 56, 49, 42, 35, 28, 21, 14, 7. 
Now we can add and subtract seven easily by navigating the telephone sequence. For example, 65 + 7 = 72 because we didn't change rows and 2 precedes 5 in the telephone sequence. 89 – 7 = 82 because 2 follows 9 in the telephone sequence and we don't change the tens' place because we changed rows. 

Here are some more problems to cut your teeth on.

In the next post, it's all about even and odd numbers. Thanks for reading.
© 2019 David W. Ward, All Rights Reserved.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Martian Mathematics

Martian Mathematics  I call this Martian mathematics because if you saw someone doing math this way, you would probably think they were from Mars.  87 × 8, no problem. That's just 670 + 26.  Weird, huh? Not everything here is "out of this world," but a good bit of it will seem strange at first. With that said, I developed this system of mental mathematics for my children. Innumeracy is a growing problem worldwide and dependence on machines for calculation is the rate-limiting step in analytical thinking. These shortcomings are what I hope to alleviate with my system. In short, the methods you will find here are intended to unshackle mathematics from pen and paper. I am, of course, not the first person to do mental mathematics. There is much to be learned from Arthur Benjamin, Scott Flansburg, and Jakow Trachtenberg. I will visit them here as well. You should follow this blog if you are interested in fast mental math or homeschooling your children in mathematics.
36 comments
Read more

Foundations-Multiplying by Half of Ten

The Multiplication Workhorse Let's begin again with a problem. Can you easily multiply 484 ×  5 in your head? If so, then how about  3261  ×  5? By the end of this post, you will be able to easily multiply any number by five provided you have mastered doubling and halving discussed in my previous posts. Multiplication by five is the workhorse of martian mathematics. At least it is for the intermediate methods of multiplying times 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. More on that in a later post. I think that everyone would agree that aside from multiplying by one, nothing is easier than multiplying by ten—just add a zero onto the end of the number. For example, 37  × 10 = 37 0 , 271  × 10 = 271 0 , and hell   × 10 = hell 0 . Well, maybe not that last one, but you get the idea: just tack a zero onto the back of the number when multiplying by ten.  Multiplying by five is almost as easy as multiplying by ten because five is just half of ten.  Using the commutative property of multiplic
1 comment
Read more

The Integral and Fractional Parts

Obscura: The Integral and Fractional Parts In my last post ( Foundations-Halving ), you learned that when halving an odd digit, you should treat it like the next lowest even number. For example, in 30 ÷ 2 we treat half of 3 the same as half of 2. Formally, this is accomplished using the mathematical function known as "the integral part." The integral part of a  is written with brackets, [ a ],  and identifies the unique integer a –1 <  [ a ] ≤ a . Similarly, the fractional part is denoted with curly brackets, { a }, such that { a } = a  – [ a ]. For example, the integral part of 3 ½ is 3  and the fractional part of 3 ½ is  ½ . When I say that half of three is one, mathematically I mean [3 ÷ 2] = [1 ½] = 1 . So, if it bothers you when I write  ½  ⋅  3 = 1, then just know that what I mean is [ ½  ⋅  3] = 1.
5 comments
Read more